On 21/03/13 00:06, Mouse wrote:
While preservation of data is important, nowadays
we have pretty much
world-wide information coverage (thanks to the Internet and superior
transport).
Of all the lists I would not expect to see such a position advanced on,
this is one of the first. Just ask anyone who's trying to find
_anything_ about old hardware. Sometimes the company doesn't even
exist any longer and it's pretty close to impossible to figure out who
their successor-in-interest is and/or who currently has possession of
the data, if indeed it still exists. Sometimes it does but doesn't
even know it ever made the hardware in question and certainly doesn't
know anything about it. Sometimes they just won't say anything, even
if you offer to go NDA. And in the remaining two cases... :-)
While this is THE place where you can find people trying to get their
hands on new hardware, the motives are because people here are
hobbyists. There isn't much we can learn from old hardware that we don't
already know. Sure, it's fascinating how they did things back in the day
but rediscovering it won't progress humanity to any real degree.
Anything
important will be propagated into the future
For what value of "important"? We have just about zero idea what year
3000 humans - if they exist - will consider important, possibly
excepting their own survival.
While I agree that there is simply no way of knowing what will be
considered important, I think we can agree that information about
technological advancements is likely to be more important than the
pictures of your 5 year old son. Of course, through some twist of fate
it, those pictures might give some insight on what it used to be like
around here, propagating information about natural disasters and whatnot
is probably more important. Bah, it might as well be that in just 50
years we advance in storage enough that we won't even have to consider
this and everyone will be able to dump everything they want to store to
some medium.
In any case, this leads me to another point I was trying to make
earlier. There is simply no need for storage that holds data for that
long. 4.7GB is not a lot in the times we live in and the technology
itself will most certainly be replaced be a cheaper alternative. If no
one will need it in a 100 years, the chances are that it wasn't very
important to use as a race and won't be needed in 200 and 300 and 1000
years. Again, if something happens to humanity where we lose most of the
knowledge then any scrap of information will be useful (albeit photos of
your dog will probably not be the most sought-after item in that scenario).
I'm glad that the product is out there but there should be less push to
try and make profit out of it and more push to advancing the technology
itself. Marketing it under the aspect of being able to store
(relatively) small amount of data for for
omg1000yearsdropeverythingbuy50 just seems? bad.
--
Mateusz K.