Is there an adapter or converter to connect an RMxx drive to a Vax 4000's
Qbus??? I can only find references to the Massbus controller and it was
meant for the 700 series unibus. I really don't have the room to add yet
another device (like an 11/780!!!), especially with an RM05 washing machine
being added, so I would much rather utilize my trusty Vax 4000 that I already
have several other devices hooked into.
Thanks.
Curt
Send cctech mailing list submissions to
cctech(a)classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctech-admin(a)classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctech digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: iUP-201 PC software (Dave Mabry)
2. Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory (Zane H. Healy)
3. RE: Teh over priced Mark-8/IBM 5100 is back (Kane, David (DPRS))
4. Re: Replacement CFX-200 Buttons (Fred Cisin)
5. Looking for Digital Channel Server II (DESNB) (Eric Dittman)
6. Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory (Roger Merchberger)
7. Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available (Ethan Dicks)
8. Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available (Jim Davis)
9. RE: Older wordprocessing software (Evan R.
Pauley)
10. Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory (Doc)
11. RE: rare TRS-80 model 3 ?? (Witchy)
12. Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory (Jochen Kunz)
13. Re: Older wordprocessing software (Jochen Kunz)
14. re: Older wordprocessing software (Eric F.)
15. Re: iUP-201 PC software (Joe)
16. TI 990 Page and simulator (James B. DiGriz)
17. re: Older wordprocessing software (Gene Ehrich)
18. Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3 (Frank Palazzolo)
19. Re: Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3 (Mark Firestone)
20. Re: Older wordprocessing software (Bryan Pope)
21. RE: Older wordprocessing software (Feldman, Robert)
22. Re: Older wordprocessing software (Gene Ehrich)
23. Re: Older wordprocessing software (Jay West)
24. Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available (Ethan Dicks)
25. Wanted: RL02 Working... (cvendel(a)att.net)
26. Re: Older wordprocessing software (Fred Cisin)
27. Items available (Bradley, Joel E -Syntegra US)
28. American Automation EZ-Pro development system (Arlen Michaels)
29. Kontron LA 32A hard drive? (Tom Owad)
30. Re: American Automation EZ-Pro development system (Douglas Wood)
31. RE: rare TRS-80 model 3 ?? (Hans Franke)
32. RE: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory (Antonio Carlini)
33. SCSI bit-banging (emanuel stiebler)
34. Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available (Bob Shannon)
35. Re: American Automation EZ-Pro development system (Arlen Michaels)
36. New Finds: SWTPC :-) (Joe)
37. /35 /40/ 45 ? (Rod Young)
38. Re: Looking for new maintainer for
DECVAX.ORG and
PDP11.ORG (Mark Tapley)
39. Re: /35 /40/ 45 ? (Zane H. Healy)
40. Re: /35 /40/ 45 ? (Jay West)
41. Re: Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3 (Cameron Kaiser)
42. Re: /35 /40/ 45 ? (Rod Young)
43. Re: Older wordprocessing software (XyWrite) (Eric F.)
44. PC-7221 (Paul Brodie)
45. Up for bid - More 'classic' goodies (Bruce Lane)
46. hp 5036A Lab (roy.harbert(a)adelphia.net)
47. Re: Older wordprocessing software (=?iso-8859-1?q?Jules=20Richardson?=)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:52:17 -0400
From: Dave Mabry <dmabry(a)mich.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: iUP-201 PC software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
There was an ISIS-based program from Intel for the iUP 201. In fact,
that's what Intel supported it first under. The MS-DOS version came
much later. The program is called IPPS. I can e-mail the ISIS version
to whoever wants it. I have to look around for the DOS version, but I
should have it, too.
Joe wrote:
> Hey Dwight,
>
> If you write something, I'd like to get a copy too. I finally got a
> working iuP 201. BTW I've been thinking of making a PC interface for the
> UPP 103. I've finally got some docs on it and found out that it only uses
> about six commands; three writes, two reads and one read status. I don't
know what they
are but it should be too hard to grab the data with a logic
analyzer. I'm not planning on doing it anytime soon, right now I'm busy
re-building some MDSs.
BTRW do you know if there was ever any software written for ISIS to
operate the iUP 201?
Joe
--
Dave Mabry dmabry(a)mich.com
Dossin Museum Underwater Research Team
--__--__--
Message: 2
Subject: Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I don't think this machine is *quite* 10
years old yet, but it's pretty
close -- and it's 'different' enough that hopefully I won't get flamed...
I'm not sure, but I think it's just over 10 years old, if not, as you say
it's pretty close.
> I have a DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP which is currently sitting idle -- it has
Tru64 Unix 5.0
on it currently, and 64Meg of RAM. I was thinking of putting
Alpha VMS 7.1 instead, for to start learning VMS again (someday... :-O )
and I recall saying that Alpha VMS is much happier in more than 64M Ram, so
I was thinking of upgrading it.
You can run it in 64MB, but it isn't fun.
I do know that it uses 'standard' 72-pin
Parity FPM Memory - but what I
don't know is: how finicky is the machine? Will just any Parity memory
work, or is it limited to certain manufacturers? I have a supplier that has
used 32M Parity 72-pin FPM memory for $6/stick -- a decent price
comparatively - I've seen it at $30+ per stick, which would make a memory
upgrade cost more than the machine itself...
You're sure that it uses 72-pin? I'm honestly not sure, I know that the
3000/300LX does, but the 3000/x00 (can't remember the exact model) that a
friend has sitting in my Living room till she finds a drive for it, uses
proprietary RAM. Anyway, I've used various 72-pin
FPM SIMMs in my Alpha's
and haven't had any problems that I can think of. Which isn't to say that
you won't have problems. The other question is, can it handle 32MB SIMMs,
and how many do you have to add at once?
BTW, 128MB is probably more than enough to just play.
Should I take the chance and order the memory, or
would it be foolhardy to
do so?
Do you deal with anyone that scraps PC's? I'm using some RAM out of Pentium
Pro's in a couple of my Alpha's.
Zane
--__--__--
Message: 3
Subject: RE: Teh over priced Mark-8/IBM 5100 is back
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:10:55 +1000
From: "Kane, David (DPRS)" <David.Kane(a)aph.gov.au>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I think we should give this guy his very own wet dream. I will bid one
MILLION dollars for it (left small finger in mouth), and someone else
can bid a few buck less. That should be a good laugh for him.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwightk.elvey@amd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 July 2003 9:06 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Teh over priced Mark-8/IBM 5100 is back
"He's Back!"
It looks like the same fellow with a new name. That'd
be my guess. Who was it that contacted eBay last time?
Maybe he should drop them another note.
As a side question, weren't most of the front panels
for the Mark-8's home made. In which case you couldn't
use someone else's photo.
Dwight
From: chris <cb(a)mythtech.net>
> The seller is the overpriced systems and swiped descriptions and
photos
>is back.
><http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2544091022&categor
y=12>
Is this
the same seller ID or a new one?
I'm really curious what exactly he is selling. The listing doesn't say
that ANYTHING is really for sale. Although whatever the nothing is, its
$50 for shipping, and $5,000 to insure it (wow, it
costs more to insure
>it than to buy it!)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Replacement CFX-200 Buttons
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Robbie Sanders wrote:
The best way to replace the buttons on a CFX-200
is to buy a used CD-401.
There is a CFX-20 on eBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/ebayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewItem&item=2644…
The 40 and 400 are interchangeable (and they have hex arithmetic)
Are the 20 and 200 interchangeable?
--__--__--
Message: 5
Subject: Looking for Digital Channel Server II (DESNB)
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:36:27 -0500 (CDT)
From: dittman(a)dittman.net (Eric Dittman)
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Does anyone have an old Digital Channel Server II (DESNB) sitting
around unused? If so, please let me know. I have someone that
needs one and is willing to pay if it works.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
--__--__--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:42:06 -0400
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
Subject: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I don't think this machine is *quite* 10 years old yet, but it's pretty
close -- and it's 'different' enough that hopefully I won't get
flamed...
I have a DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP which is currently sitting idle -- it has
Tru64 Unix 5.0 on it currently, and 64Meg of RAM. I was thinking of putting
Alpha VMS 7.1 instead, for to start learning VMS again (someday... :-O )
and I recall saying that Alpha VMS is much happier in more than 64M Ram, so
I was thinking of upgrading it.
I do know that it uses 'standard' 72-pin Parity FPM Memory - but what I
don't know is: how finicky is the machine? Will just any Parity memory
work, or is it limited to certain manufacturers? I have a supplier that has
used 32M Parity 72-pin FPM memory for $6/stick -- a
decent price
comparatively - I've seen it at $30+ per stick, which would make a memory
upgrade cost more than the machine itself...
I have no idea what they have for manufacturers of the memory - these guys
prolly don't, either. It's a reputable company (I've ordered from them
before) but they don't get too deep with the specifics. (WRT another OT
thread: They have 3Com 905C-TX NICS for $10 each...)
Should I take the chance and order the memory, or would it be foolhardy to
do so?
Thanks,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 22:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
--- Robert Krten <root(a)parse.com> wrote:
> For those of you who missed the announcement in alt.sys.pdp8,
> I've now almost completed the M220 version B schematic. It's
> available at:
>
Cool! Thanks! I have a few M220 cards that will eventually benefit
from your efforts (I borrowed them from a parts machine to keep the
main machines running).
The trials and tribulations of the PDP-8/I
restoration can be
found at:
http://www.parse.com/~pdp8/pdp8i/restore.html
Plenty-o-dead 7474's in that one :-)
That's been my experience, too. I have replaced as many as 8 7474s
at a go to get an -8/L back on its feet. I don't recall replacing
any other chip, as a matter of fact.
-ethan
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 23:14:14 -0700
From: Jim Davis <jpdavis(a)gorge.net>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Ethan Dicks wrote:
>--- Robert Krten <root(a)parse.com> wrote:
>
>
>>For those of you who missed the announcement in alt.sys.pdp8,
>>I've now almost completed the M220 version B schematic. It's
>>available at:
>>
Cool! Thanks! I have a few M220 cards that will eventually benefit
from your efforts (I borrowed them from a parts machine to keep the
main machines running).
The trials and tribulations of the PDP-8/I
restoration can be
found at:
http://www.parse.com/~pdp8/pdp8i/restore.html
Plenty-o-dead 7474's in that one :-)
That's been my experience, too. I have replaced as many as 8 7474s
at a go to get an -8/L back on its feet. I don't recall replacing
any other chip, as a matter of fact.
-ethan
7474's Dead d flops? whats the story on that?
Jim
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: "Evan R. Pauley" <evan(a)flextech.net>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Older wordprocessing software
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:48:36 -0500
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Jules,
I still have most of those old versions of WordPerfect 5.1 DOS, WordPerfect
6.0 for both DOS and Windows (the file formats are
identical, BTW), MS
Office 4.3 for Win3x, AmiPro/Samna, and even (gasp) MultiMate. I have
*several* copies of the WordPerfect 5.1 manuals, along with some old Lotus
1-2-3 v2.3 and Harvard Graphics manuals (and the software for those also).
Personally, I was a WordPerfect aficionado (because of the DOS/WIN file
format matching). Hated Word, and used AmiPro/Samna for legal documents
(best on the planet back then).
Most are on 5-1/4", a few are on 3-1/2", and Office is on CD. Let me know
privately what you need and we'll work out a way to get it to you.
Evan Pauley
----------
You wrote:
Hi all, perhaps pusing the boundaries of off-topicness here a little, but...
I'm taking suggestions for wordprocessing software to run on an older 486
laptop (1994, so almost within the 10 year limit!) that's running Windows
3.11
...
I still use the machine for a bit of wordprocessing ocassionally (such as it
is
with Windows Write), and better software would be
nice. The laptop's handy
for
taking stuff down on before formatting things 'properly' on a more modern
desktop.
I remember Ami Pro being quite reasonable on a similar spec desktop machine,
but my copy went to tape years ago and around half of the old tapes of mine
that I found recently are no longer readable :-(
Suggestions of alternative software welcome though...
cheers
Jules
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 02:21:13 -0500
From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Roger Merchberger wrote:
> I do know that it uses 'standard' 72-pin Parity FPM Memory - but what I
> don't know is: how finicky is the machine? Will just any Parity memory
> work, or is it limited to certain manufacturers? I have a supplier that
> has used 32M Parity 72-pin FPM memory for $6/stick -- a decent price
comparatively
- I've seen it at $30+ per stick, which would make a
memory upgrade cost more than the machine itself...
There are a bunch of different 3000/300 models. The 3000/300X and
the 3000/300 both take commodity 36-bit parity SIMMs. My 3k/300X is
running RAM from a Mac, from a DEC "Jensen", and from Goodwill.
The best thumbnail reference directory I've found are on the
DEC/Linux pages:
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~prescott/linux/alpha/dec3000-sysinfo.html
Doc
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: "Witchy" <witchy(a)binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
To: <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: rare TRS-80 model 3 ??
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:17:12 +0100
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctech-admin(a)classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-admin@classiccmp.org]On
> Behalf Of Mail List
> Sent: 07 July 2003 03:25
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: RE: rare TRS-80 model 3 ??
>
> Might depend on what environment it was designed for. If for home
or office
110v would be almost exclusively the norm. If it was designed for
an industrial
environment, 220v may have been used sometimes. Plus, so many pieces of
equipment were designed to be switchable between 110v and 220v.
It just seems odd that the machine itself was set for 110V whereas its
printer is exclusively 240V:
http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/dmp100.jpg
Of course, I'm only assuming it belonged to the machine because everything
came from the same yard sale - Model 3 with plastic cover, DMP100 printer
with plastic cover, cassette deck and a box of paper.....
cheers
--
adrian/witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - monthly gothic shenanigans
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:14:03 +0200
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On 2003.07.08 06:42 Roger Merchberger wrote:
I do know that it uses 'standard' 72-pin
Parity FPM Memory - but
what I don't know is: how finicky is the machine? Will just any
Parity memory work, or is it limited to certain manufacturers?
It should accept
any FPM parity (36 bit) SIMMs. One bank consists of two
SIMMs. In fact, it uses long word parity, i.e 33 bit SIMMs like the
AS500. I think it can use only 8 MB and 32 MB SIMMs.
Should I take the chance and order the memory, or
would it be
foolhardy to do so?
Well. By two SIMMs, look if they work and by additional 6 if
they do. I
have a 300X with 256 MB RAM, thats nice.
In an other mail Zane isn't sure if it uses 72 pin SIMMs or proprietary
RAM. All models of DEC 3000-300 use 72 pin SIMMs. The DEC
3000-[456789]00 models use very special 100 pin SIMMs and they need 8
per bank.
--
tschüß,
Jochen
Homepage:
http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
--__--__--
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:41:32 +0200
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On 2003.07.07 15:32 Jules Richardson wrote:
I'm taking suggestions for wordprocessing
software to run on an older
486 laptop (1994, so almost within the 10 year limit!) that's running
Windows 3.11
1. Replace Windows with an operating system. E.g. Linux or NetBSD.
(Especially the later runs very well on older hardware with non-GHz CPUs
and only a few MB RAM.)
You may skip this step if you are not willing to wrap your head around
Unix.
2. LaTeX. Period.
I used several WYSIWYG text processing software at that time
(WordPerfect, AmiPro, StarWriter, ...) and they all sucked. Then I got
into Unix and LaTeX and stayed there since then. LaTeX is not that easy
to learn, but you get _very_ good results for your work. I think (La)TeX
is the most bug free software on this planet. IIRC the LaTeX
distribution for WinDOS and OS/2 of that time was
called EMTEX. If you
are able to switch to Linux or NetBSD you can use the most recent teTeX.
--
tschüß,
Jochen
Homepage:
http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
--__--__--
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 02:26:01 -0700
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: "Eric F." <elf(a)ucsd.edu>
Subject: re: Older wordprocessing software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On Mon, Jul 7, 08:36:00, 2003, Jules Richardson wrote:
I remember Ami Pro being quite reasonable on a
similar spec desktop machine,
but my copy went to tape years ago and around half of the old tapes of mine
that I found recently are no longer readable :-(
Suggestions of alternative software welcome though...
XyWrite comes to mind: low resource requirements, yet oodles of formatting
options.
It takes a bit of time and practice to build up some speedy chops, so it
may not be the panacea you're looking for. I do know, however, that
XyWrite's format can be successfully converted
into (many of) today's
common word processing formats.
Regards,
Eric
--__--__--
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 07:06:55
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: iUP-201 PC software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I think I found an ISIS version of iPPS last night but I'd like to get
he MS-DOS version if you have it. Do you have the pinout for the cable?
Joe
At 08:52 PM 7/7/03 -0400, you wrote:
>There was an ISIS-based program from Intel for the iUP 201. In fact,
>that's what Intel supported it first under. The MS-DOS version came
>much later. The program is called IPPS. I can e-mail the ISIS version
>to whoever wants it. I have to look around for the DOS version, but I
>should have it, too.
>
>Joe wrote:
>
>> Hey Dwight,
>>
>> If you write something, I'd like to get a copy too. I finally got a
working iuP 201. BTW I've been thinking of making
a PC interface for the
UPP 103. I've finally got some docs on it and found out that it only uses
about six commands; three writes, two reads and one read status. I don't
know what they are but it should be too hard to grab the data with a logic
analyzer. I'm not planning on doing it anytime soon, right now I'm busy
re-building some MDSs.
BTRW do you know if there was ever any software written for ISIS to
operate the iUP 201?
Joe
--
Dave Mabry dmabry(a)mich.com
Dossin Museum Underwater Research Team
--__--__--
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 07:47:01 -0400
From: "James B. DiGriz" <jbdigriz(a)dragonsweb.org>
Organization: DragonsWeb Labs
To: ti-990(a)yahoogroups.com, cctalk(a)classiccmp.org, swpb(a)yahoogroups.com,
ti99-4a(a)yahoogroups.com
Subject: TI 990 Page and simulator
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Dunno if everyone has seen this, but there is a fairly
new 990 web page
up by David PItts, who has written a simulator and cross-development
tools for Linux and Windows.
It might be interesting to take something like this, or M.E.S.S. or one
of the other simulators, and reimplement the DX10 4A dev tools. Maybe
somebody might even still have them around somewhere. Hmmm.
http://www.cozx.com/~dpitts/ti990.html
later,
jbdigriz
--__--__--
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 08:20:50 -0400
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Gene Ehrich <gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: re: Older wordprocessing software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
At 02:26 AM 7/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
XyWrite comes to mind: low resource requirements,
yet oodles of formatting
options.
What ever happened to XyWrite, was it acquired by another company?
--__--__--
Message: 18
From: "Frank Palazzolo" <palazzol(a)comcast.net>
To: <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:45:34 -0400
Organization: Knarfian Labs
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Anyone else spot that one near the end of the movie? It was one of the
80-column models.
Not sure what any of the other "30-year old" computers were.
-Frank
--__--__--
Message: 19
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:03:09 +0100
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Mark Firestone <nedry(a)mail.bedlambells.com>
Subject: Re: Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I haven't seen it yet, but Captain Kirk owns one! Check out Star Trek
II... in his apartment...
At 08:45 08/07/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Anyone else spot that one near the end of the
movie? It was one of the
80-column models.
Not sure what any of the other "30-year old" computers were.
-Frank
[---------]
"Homer, we don't have to have sex."
"Yes we do, the cookie told me so."
"Deserts aren't always right Homer."
"But they're so delicious."
Website:
retrobbs.org
BBS: telnet
bbs.retrobbs.org 2323
Tradewars: telnet
tradewars.retrobbs.org
[---------]
--__--__--
Message: 20
From: Bryan Pope <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:08:15 -0400 (edt)
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
And thusly Joe spake:
What about DisplayWrite?? :)
*ducking and sprinting for cover*
Cheers,
Bryan
Geez, why not just use Edlin? :-/
Joe
Hey I forgot about that wonderful creation!
But then there is also:
C:>copy < document.txt
(I think it goes this way...)
Cheers,
Bryan
--__--__--
Message: 21
Subject: RE: Older wordprocessing software
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 07:21:55 -0600
From: "Feldman, Robert" <Robert_Feldman(a)jdedwards.com>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
C>Copy con foo.txt<CR>
Foo bar baz<CR>
Testing^Z<CR>
C>
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Pope [mailto:bpope@wordstock.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:08 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
And thusly Joe spake:
What about DisplayWrite?? :)
*ducking and sprinting for cover*
Cheers,
Bryan
Geez, why not just use Edlin? :-/
Joe
Hey I forgot about that wonderful creation!
But then there is also:
C:>copy < document.txt
(I think it goes this way...)
Cheers,
Bryan
--__--__--
Message: 22
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:32:05 -0400
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Gene Ehrich <gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
At 09:08 AM 7/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >What about DisplayWrite?? :)
I used DWA (Display Write Assistant) for years and it was an outstanding
piece of software
--__--__--
Message: 23
From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:38:22 -0500
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
When I do have the need for word processing on my vintage boxes, I use SATURN
on RT-11.
Jay West
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Ehrich
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
At 09:08 AM 7/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >What about DisplayWrite?? :)
I used DWA (Display Write Assistant) for years and it was an outstanding
piece of software
--__--__--
Message: 24
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 07:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
--- Jim Davis <jpdavis(a)gorge.net> wrote:
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
> >That's been my experience, too. I have replaced as many as 8 7474s
> >at a go to get an -8/L back on its feet. I don't recall replacing
any other chip, as a matter of fact.
-ethan
7474's Dead d flops? whats the story on that?
Jim
Dunno. I can say categorically that they were failed chips. They
did not pass muster in a handheld TTL tester, and when replaced,
the PDP-8/L worked.
There was a mention on the list of a batch of 7440s that failed in
another M-series machine (might or might not have been an -8/L)
with the same date code.
Not sure why 7474s from the mid-to-late 1960s would be more fragile
than, say, 7400s. Perhaps the flipping and the flopping wears them
out faster than anding and oring? :-)
-ethan
--__--__--
Message: 25
From: cvendel(a)att.net
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Wanted: RL02 Working...
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:04:55 +0000
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Hi everyone,
I found a place on the East Coast selling RL02's and RLV12's for $120, anyone
in the NJ/NY/CT/MA/RI area (basically anyone in like a 3hr driving radius of
me) have an RL02 they want to sell cheap??? I'd
like to pick the unit up and
save myself the $100 shipping charge (plus the worries of it bouncing around in
the back of a UPS or Fedex Ground truck!) So I'd be willing to pay someone in
my area $100 for a drive and $20 for an RLV12 if you have them and they are
known working, please let me know, thanks!!!
Also I'm still looking for an RM05 or CDC9976 300MB Disk Pak drive, if
someone in my area has one that I could take on loan for 1 week and return for
a $$$ Rental Fee, I'd be willing to work something out with them.
Thanks,
Curt
--__--__--
Message: 26
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Bryan Pope wrote:
C:>copy < document.txt
(I think it goes this way...)
copy con: document.txt
The colon is optional on most versions, but helps as a
reminder that it is
a device, and avoids problems if one manages to creat a file named CON.
--__--__--
Message: 27
From: "Bradley, Joel E -Syntegra US" <Joel.E.Bradley(a)syntegra.com>
To: "'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Items available
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:50:33 -0500
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I have the following items available. Please e-mail me directly at
joel.bradley(a)comcast.net if interested:
Sony PIC-1000 Magic Link with software (PDA circa 1994)
Control Data Corporation Cyber 960 Framed and Matted photograph (approx 24"
x 20")
Control Data Corporation Cyber 960 Matted photograph, No Frame (approx 24" x
20")
Control Data Corporation 3 - Ring Binder (many available)
Control Data Corporation White Coffee Mugs (individual or set available)
Control Data Corporation Legal Pad portfolio, brown leather-like material.
NICE!
Microsoft Excel 2.2 for Macintosh - MINT IN BOX, still
shrinkwrapped!
------
Joel
--__--__--
Message: 28
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:22:11 -0400
Subject: American Automation EZ-Pro development system
From: Arlen Michaels <arlen(a)acm.org>
To: classiccmp <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
This microprocessor development system dating from the early 80s includes a
hardware in-circuit emulator for the Motorola 68HC11. I'd like to get it
running but I have no documents or software. Can anyone help?
The main box is model number AA-547 and I believe it hooks up by serial
cable to a host PC. Besides the external ICE hardware, there's also a small
prom programmer box hanging off the system.
Thanks in advance,
Arlen Michaels
--__--__--
Message: 29
From: Tom Owad <owad(a)applefritter.com>
To: Classic Computer <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Kontron LA 32A hard drive?
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:11:32 -0400
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I have Kontron LA 32A Logic Analyzer that complains
about no boot disk on
startup. It has two drive bays, the first of which has a floppy drive
and the second of which is empty.
Does anybody know what software I'd need to get this running or would be
willing to make copies?
Thanks,
Tom
Applefritter
www.applefritter.com
--__--__--
Message: 30
From: "Douglas Wood" <dbwood(a)kc.rr.com>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: American Automation EZ-Pro development system
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:27:56 -0500
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
An 'HC11 emulator from the "early '80s"? I'm going from solely from
memory
here, but I don't think that the 'HC11 existed then. Do you possibly mean
the 6805 series of microcontroller, perhaps?
Douglas Wood
Software Engineer
dbwood(a)kc.rr.com
ICQ#: 143841506
Home of the EPICIS Development System for the PIC
http://epicis.piclist.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arlen Michaels" <arlen(a)acm.org>
To: "classiccmp"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: American Automation EZ-Pro development system
This microprocessor development system dating
from the early 80s includes
a
hardware in-circuit emulator for the Motorola
68HC11. I'd like to get it
running but I have no documents or software. Can anyone help?
The main box is model number AA-547 and I believe it hooks up by serial
cable to a host PC. Besides the external ICE hardware, there's also a
small
prom programmer box hanging off the system.
Thanks in advance,
Arlen Michaels
--__--__--
Message: 31
From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
Organization: SIEMENS AG
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:29:38 +0200
Subject: RE: rare TRS-80 model 3 ??
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> > > Another puzzle is why mine came with a 240V printer when it was a 110V US
> > > machine? How common is a 240V circuit over there, apart for the likes of
> >
washing machines?
How
common is equipment that runs on 240V besides large appliances sold in
the US? Not very much.
Might depend on what environment it was designed for. If for home or office
110v would be almost exclusively the norm. If it was designed for an
industrial
environment, 220v may have been used sometimes.
Plus, so many pieces of
equipment were designed to be switchable between 110v and 220v.
Well, maybe keep in Mind that Witchy lives in Britain, and 240 is
there (as for most other parts of the world) the standard voltage.
High power (3 phases) is supposed to be 400 :)
Now, for the question it's rather where did you buy the machine?
Since the Printer is 240 I assume in Europe. In the late 70s a lot
of machines got directly imported and the people used step down
transformers to operate them - Often dealers even managed to sell
these beasts to customers when the original PSU was switchable to
220 and so maxing the profit :)
Gruss
H.
--
VCF Europa 5.0 am 01./02. Mai 2004 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/
--__--__--
Message: 32
From: "Antonio Carlini" <arcarlini(a)iee.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Kinda OT: DEC 3000 Model 300 AXP Memory
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 21:32:03 +0100
Organization: me@home
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Manx (
http://vt100.net/manx ) has an upgrade manual listed for it
(try searching on "dec 3000"). If that doesn't help, I have
a service guide around somewhere, so yell.
(And, yes, OpenVMS will feel much happier in 128MB).
Antonio
--
---------------
Antonio Carlini arcarlini(a)iee.org
--__--__--
Message: 33
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:36:07 -0600
From: emanuel stiebler <emu(a)ecubics.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: SCSI bit-banging
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Hi all,
I guess we all remember this boards attached to
ataris/commodores/apples, where we had a PIA/parallel port to attach
some of the nice SCSI disks.
However, I don't find anything about this old
bit-banging interfaces on
the net.
Any links ?
cheers
--__--__--
Message: 34
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:44:32 -0400
From: Bob Shannon <bshannon(a)tiac.net>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: M220B (PDP-8/I) schematics available
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Jim Davis wrote:
<snip>
That's been my experience, too. I have replaced as many as 8 7474s
at a go to get an -8/L back on its feet. I don't recall replacing
any other chip, as a matter of fact.
-ethan
7474's Dead d flops? whats the story on that?
Jim
Good question! I've also chased down several bad 7474's in my Imlac,
and I suspect some bad 7474's on a
few HP 1000 series I/O boards I have down in the shop.
Is the 7474 a 'dog'? I've know a few TTL parts that were pretty bad,
mainly counters though. But a latch?
--__--__--
Message: 35
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 19:15:42 -0400
Subject: Re: American Automation EZ-Pro development
system
From: Arlen Michaels <arlen(a)acm.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
on 8/7/03 4:27 PM, Douglas Wood at dbwood(a)kc.rr.com wrote:
An 'HC11 emulator from the "early
'80s"? I'm going from solely from memory
here, but I don't think that the 'HC11 existed then. Do you possibly mean
the 6805 series of microcontroller, perhaps?
Sorry, I should have said "late 80s". The firmware in the 68HC11 emulator
pod is dated 1-18-89. The design of the main box likely did originate
somewhat earlier because it appears to be based on the SS-50 bus (believe it
or not) and certainly AA produced emulators for other early Motorola cpu's.
Arlen Michaels
--
Arlen Michaels
arlen(a)acm.org
--__--__--
Message: 36
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:26:09
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: New Finds: SWTPC :-)
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
A friend of mine picked up about 30 boxs of
electronics parts, data
books, evaluation kits, parts samples, etc at a local flea market last
week. Today I was helping him go through the stuff and I spotted some
familar looking boards. I picked one up and remarked that it looked like
something for the SWTPCs. Then THE very next board that I picked up was
marked "SWTPC" so I knew I was onto somehting good. I dug through the boxs
and got 6+ boxs of disks with software for the FLEX OS (used on the SWTPCs)
and found six circuit boards for the SWTPCs. Here's the list: (1) SWTPC
MP-09 - Replacement CPU board for the SWTPC computers, uses 6809 CPU. This
is a MP-09, not an A or B. (2) A Southeastern Micro Systems DDC-16 Floppy
Drive Controller. (3) A Tanner Computers SS-50 64k memory board, uses 2716
EPROMs or 6116 S RAMs. This one has the S RAMS installed. (4) A SWTPC MP-R
2716 EPROM burner card. (5) A SWTPC MP-T Interrupt Timer board. It's
implemented with a 5009 programmable counter/ divider
and 6820 PIA ICs and
provides software selectable interrupts of 1 usec, 10 usec, 100 usec, 1
msec, 10 msec, 20 msec, 100 msec, 1 sec, 10 sec, 100 sec, 1 min, 10 min or
1 hour. (6) A Gimix 2 port Serial Interface board. Fits the SS-30 socket
and uses two MC68B50s. I found everything else described on Michal Holley's
SWTPC site but not this one. Does anyone have any details on it?
Pretty good haul, specailly considering that I didn't have to go
anywhere and find it :-)
Joe
--__--__--
Message: 37
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:22:34 -0600
From: Rod Young <rodyoung(a)shaw.ca>
Subject: /35 /40/ 45 ?
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Well, I'll take a chance and ask... just in case timing is right...
I'm looking for a PDP 11/35, or /40 to add to the collection. I know I
know, who isn't looking for one!
I have a few 11/23's and misc cards I might consider trading in case anyone
in Western Canada has a /35 or /40 they are looking to
trade??? sell ???
or just find a good home for...
thx
rod
--__--__--
Message: 38
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 08:52:21 -0500
From: Mark Tapley <mtapley(a)bams.ccf.swri.edu>
Subject: Re: Looking for new maintainer for
DECVAX.ORG and
PDP11.ORG
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
mrbill wrote:
>I've also got about a truck-full (maybe a station wagon load, maybe
>less) of old DEC documentation, handbooks, software on paper tape, a
>disc pack or two... Jeff Sharp has seen my garage. 8-) I can't ship any
>of it (unless you provide a FedEx or UPS account number to bill to), and
>would like to avoid throwing it in the trash. At least 3-4 "storage tubs"
>of manuals and documentation, a mixed VMS 4/5 "orange wall", and various
>other things.
>
>If you're interested, please contact me by email. I don't have time for
>DEC/PDP stuff anymore, and need the space in my garage back - but want
it all to go to
someone worthwhile.
I don't have room to keep this, but if anyone is interested in this,
could likely help with a "rescue". Let me know when/if you want to
set something up.
--
- Mark
210-522-6025, page 888-733-0967
--__--__--
Message: 39
Subject: Re: /35 /40/ 45 ?
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
I'm looking for a PDP 11/35, or /40 to add
to the collection. I know I
know, who isn't looking for one!
I'm not. I don't have the room :^(
Zane
--__--__--
Message: 40
From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: /35 /40/ 45 ?
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:04:38 -0500
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Zane wrote....
I'm not. I don't have the room :^(
I *DO* have the room, and I AM looking for a 35/40/45 *grin*.
So of someone is getting a little tight on space.....
Jay (dreaming) West
--__--__--
Message: 41
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)floodgap.com>
Subject: Re: Commodore CBM/PET in Terminator 3
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Anyone else spot that one near the end of the
movie? It was one of the
80-column models.
Yeah, I noticed that. I'm wondering which computer John Connor knocked on
the ground, though. It looked like an early X-term of some vintage.
--
---------------------------------- personal:
http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser(a)floodgap.com
-- High explosives are applicable where truth and logic fail. -- Marcello Corno
--__--__--
Message: 42
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:40:01 -0600
From: Rod Young <rodyoung(a)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: /35 /40/ 45 ?
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
And... if someone wants to swap an 35/40/45 for my 11/23 ---SMILE... let me
know!
rod (hoping)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: /35 /40/ 45 ?
Zane wrote....
I'm not. I don't have the room :^(
I *DO* have the room, and I AM looking for a 35/40/45 *grin*.
So of someone is getting a little tight on space.....
Jay (dreaming) West
--__--__--
Message: 43
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 02:56:53 -0700
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: "Eric F." <elf(a)ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software (XyWrite)
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
On Tue, 08-Jul-2003, @ 08:20:50 -0400, Gene Ehrich wrote:
What ever happened to XyWrite, was it acquired by
another company?
Yeah - something like that. XyWrite's history of commercial development
took a few odd turns, and suffered the consequences of some marketing mishaps.
A web page w/some decent info on XyWrite can be found @
http://www.escape.com/~yesss/_xywhat.htm
(This is not my web site, BTW.)
Regards,
Eric
--__--__--
Message: 44
From: Paul Brodie <brodie(a)goulburn.net.au>
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 23:04:22 +1000
Subject: PC-7221
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Mike,
I also have a Sharp lunch box computer and
have tried to get a boot disk or config disk. Have
you had any luck ?
Regards
Brodie
--__--__--
Message: 45
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 07:46:25 -0700
From: "Bruce Lane" <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Up for bid - More 'classic' goodies
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Shameless plug alert!
I've got a few items in my latest crop of auctions that may be of
interest to those of you running MicroVAX, MicroPDP, or IBM PS/2 Model 70 or 80
systems.
First off, there's an IBM 'Blue Lightning' CPU upgrade kit, unused and
still in its original packaging. This takes a 386 PS/2 system up to IBM's
486DLC.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=27…
Second is another Maxtor XT2190 drive, which I'm told is the same as a
DEC RD54. Don't know for sure what shape it's in, but I recall it was a pull
from an old PC (which got scrapped).
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=27…
Finally, there's a DEC RRD40 CD-ROM drive (the one with the psychotic
D-sub 15 connector on its case).
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=27…
There's other non-classic (and non-computer) stuff as well, if you're
curious. No reserve on anything, some stuff listed as 'buy-it-now.'
Thanks for looking.
Anyway, hit E-pay and do a seller search
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies --
http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
--__--__--
Message: 46
From: <roy.harbert(a)adelphia.net>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: hp 5036A Lab
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:04:18 -0400
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Do you still have loose bound copies of the manual? I would be glad to scan and
post them as I am in need of them myself. I just purchased a lab from eBay, but
it came with no manual or processor.
Do you happen to know if there are any micro's floating around??
Thanks for your time,
Roy
--__--__--
Message: 47
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 23:58:17 +0100 (BST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jules=20Richardson?=
<julesrichardsonuk(a)yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Older wordprocessing software
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Windows
3.11
1. Replace Windows with an operating system. E.g. Linux or NetBSD.
(Especially the later runs very well on older hardware with non-GHz CPUs
and only a few MB RAM.)
You may skip this step if you are not willing to wrap your head around
Unix.
Ahh, been there though. I did run Linux on this very same laptop for a while -
I believe it was AbiWord I used as a basic GUI-based wordprocessor for my
scribbles.
At the time, one problem was the lack of CDROM drive on the machine for getting
any large software onto it. The only parallel-port drive I had access to was a
Microsolutions Backpack, and no matter what I tried it refused to work with
Linux. No problems there under DOS / Win311.
Second problem was one of performance - the linux distributions that were
around a couple of years ago tended to be aimed at slightly faster hardware. I
do still have old distributions lying around back to around 1994 or so (I
remember the days of SLS on 50 or so floppies - it was always guaranteed *one*
of the disks would be dead, usually near the end of the pile :) but then I'd
have all sorts of compatibility problems with any modern software. Alternately
I could trim down a more modern version of Linux - but
that's a lot of effort
for something that just gets used for casual note-taking now and then.
Third problem is also performance-related, and down to the time it takes Linux
- or any modern MS operating system - to start up and shut down. If I just want
to spend a couple of minutes typing some notes, I don't want to be taking the
same length of time waiting for the machine to boot and then shut down again at
the end. With DOS / Win311 the startup and shutdown is extremely quick.
Maybe there's a version of NetBSD that gets round the second problem, but I bet
it still takes a lot longer than DOS/Windows does to boot and shut down.
I used several WYSIWYG text processing software
at that time
(WordPerfect, AmiPro, StarWriter, ...) and they all sucked.
Wordperfect 6.0 I assume, 5.1 not being particularly WYSIWYG as I recall :-)
And yes, from memory 6.0 did suck; all these posts have reminded me of all the
wordprocessing software I'd forgotten about. I
used to use 5.1 a *lot* under
DOS until I started running Windows 3 on the PC I had back then.
I have a horrible feeling the negative thing I vaguely recall about Ami Pro was
its stability, at least in the version I had :-( Maybe there were later
releases with the problems ironed out, or it was just some odd problem with the
machine I had back then. If I can trace a copy then I'll find out I suppose...
Someone mentioned DisplayWrite too - arghh! That had totally faded from my
memory. My father's work made it their standard for a while; I should have
access to a copy in theory but I have no plans to try and track that one
down... :-)
cheers
Jules
________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
End of cctech Digest