8 Feb
2016
8 Feb
'16
12:04 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
On 2/8/16 10:09 AM, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
I'm envisioning a 1U enclosure connecting to the 11/20 by BC11A, as you
suggest. The device could have its own PSU to avoid the risk of
overloading the 11/20's supply, and fit in a standard rack if desired.
Make it so! :-)
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
So, things are moving forward. I also wanted to
get folk's opinion on
the need to actually produce
an SBC form factor board. In other words (and sort of in line with how
peripherals were done on the
original 11/20) is it OK to have the MEM11 be outside of the 11/20
chassis and connect via BC11A
(my replica) cables?
main problem would be now you'll have to come up with a box and a power
supply
I assume you meant SPC (quad unibus) and not SBC