From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at siconic.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:13 AM
  On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
   I tend to agree with you. We should be thinking
this way.
 Still, I believe that development work should be done in
 an environment that is handy and convenient. The USB is
 just a machine interconnect. One just has to keep in mind
 what the final product will be like. In other words, don't
 lock the design into one specific format.
  The only issue I have with USB is that it requires drivers
 for each machine it is connected to. These have to be
 specific to the USB device we use to interface with.
 RS-232 is generic enough that we could run things from
 text files using simple terminal modes on almost any machine. 
 I dispute Barry's assertion that serial is going away.  Perhaps in
 consumer products it will be supplanted by USB.  But in development
 products and applications, and low level controller and embedded system
 devices, it'll be around for quite a while yet.
 I'd argue that the serial port is the most under-rated device is
 computing.  It is the most widely deployed communcations protocol and
 allows computers 1 month old to connect and transfer data to computers
 that are over 30 years old.
 As for Dwight's main argument that the interface is not the main focus, I
 agree.
 --
 Sellam Ismail                                        Vintage Computer
 Festival
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 International Man of Intrigue and Danger
 
http://www.vintage.org
 [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage
 mputers   ]
 [ and academia at 
www.VintageTech.com  || at
 
http://marketplace.vintage.org  ] 
I keep forgetting, what is the most recommended way to hook up a dial up
modem to Linux ;-)
I have never seen a modern PC without a serial port but if USB is absolutely
required there are USB to serial adapters.
Randy