No, the problem is the redefinition of Derivative
Works to include any
images produced by the device using the KF binary software
distribution. Since the binary blob falls under this license, this
means all IPFs (and STREAM dumps too) that were dumped with the KF.
Although not intentional, this is the heritage of the library when there was nothing else
to be covered. We don't claim ownership in any data dumped with KryoFlux, and this
will be addressed in the next release. For now all I can offer is that people in doubt
will get written (email) confirmation. This applies to all data ever read with the unit.
Thanks for pointing this out.
If all you wanted to do is prevent compilation CDs of
IPFs,
prohibiting the IPF library from being redistributed should have been
enough. Such a prohibition is in the licenses. I don't see why such a
redefinition of derivative works, and restriction on what you can do
with these "derivative works", was ever necessary.
There was a time when such companies would just feed whatever they could into extended
ADFs, which would have caused more trouble than fun. Again, this was when the Amiga was
still in the commercial marketplace and the idea was to stop people from forging things.