1 Sep
2014
1 Sep
'14
5:34 p.m.
On 2014-Sep-01, at 5:04 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Sep 1, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Brent Hilpert <hilpert
at cs.ubc.ca> wrote:
On 2014-Sep-01, at 4:58 PM, David Riley wrote:
On 2014-Sep-01, at 4:38 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Yes, but it also has arguments or other stuff in curly braces, and I don?t see those
here. Can anyone identify the text formatting program
that the following is meant for? Looks kind of like nroff, but it's not (particularly
those @-leadin sequences):
CHAP5
\format,16,60,66,8,60
\define,ref $&1
\title,c=- #p -
\block,i8
\nojust
\setu1
\seth at A
\setss[]
\seto!
\double
\page211
\blank
\skip10
\center,b,u,=Chapter 5 at D Biomass, Production and the Fishery
\skip6
15.1 Introduction1
\setu1,notblanks
A general review of the central and upper Amazon fishery has been
attempted based on comparative yield data (Bayley 1981).
Thanks for any pointers,
Chuck
What about LaTeX? It's been a few decades since I've used it, but it did use
" \<command> " (backslash-command). On Sep 1, 2014, at 19:51, Brent Hilpert <hilpert at
cs.ubc.ca> wrote:
OK .. Looking at my old code I see a lot of curly braces, but I don't remember how
far you could go with the macro syntax, or how much LaTeX differed from TeX.
What about LaTeX? It's been a few decades
since I've used it, but it did use " \<command> " (backslash-command).
It's not TeX of any sort. I don't know what it is, but having used it a lot over
the past decade, I'm pretty sure it's not. Close, but that's not how it takes
parameters to commands, and there are a few other inconsistencies.
- Dave