6 Aug
2006
6 Aug
'06
4:31 p.m.
On 8/6/2006 at 4:15 PM Don wrote:
Though annoying that they had to partition them into
ADDRESS
and DATA :-(
Ah, I'd done my time on the CDC 6000-series and it seemed pretty natural to
me, even if changing an address register didn't result in a load or store
of the corresponding data register. I wonder what an outsider would have
made of 6000 assembly code? "SA6 A6" for example...
Cheers,
Chuck