24 May
2005
24 May
'05
1:03 a.m.
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Paul Koning wrote:
You can rely on the skill and the luck of those who
come after us --
which is what happened in the past (because it wasn't considered). Or
we can do explicit planning to improve the odds. Again, I like the
work of the Long Now foundation because it seems like a fascinating
example of what you get when you really dig hard into these questions
and assume as little as possible.
This sort of gets to the heart of the matter. Why make it challenging for
future generations when we have the wisdom, intelligence and means today
to preserve enough information for future generations to eliminate the
guessing. Sure, mysteries are fun, but why create mysteries
unnecessarily?
Save all the information when it's still fresh and with as much supporting
information as possible. Assume everyone in the future will be more
stupid than you, and with crappier technology.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]