Either option is useful, both options are still currently used and
practical in the industry. I've worked at different companies where the
philosophy is totally opposite. It all depends on the component
selection, from the power supply , everything in between, size of the
circuit card, to the backplane. There are non-standard systems which are
migrating to the central power supply design (and using standard
backplanes or edge connectors), but there is usually a small DC-DC
converter onboard dedicated for low voltages. Then with newer
components(ex: new static rams) , they draw less power, circuit cards
with power/ground layers have more power and thermal capacity(power
density) . I recall the S-100 cards I used back then were at most only 2
layers, so the power and thermal characteristics were limited as
compared to say the VME cards. I think the S-100 breadboards that are
still available are only 2 layers.
In the local power supply option, we had DC-DC converters which have
such a low footprint where we embedded this on the circuit card(24"x24")
and the power supplies (via backplane) would have power rails supply 48V
to every card. In a central power systems, we had circuit cards just as
large and all the power supplies just sit at the bottom of the 19" rack
and supply the backplane with various voltages, with thick, huge cables.
The backplane is important such that you don't want to experience too
much impedance or resistance (thicker copper is better), solid power and
ground layers is expected. You might want to use an off-the-shelf
backplane for this purpose--there might be limited availability of S-100
backplanes with these features.The commodity backplanes in use today
still have a central power supply, such as CPCI, with many layers. The
most they would have onboard is another little DC-DC converter for low
voltage components(3.3v or 2.5v).
With the traditional S-100 backplane and a central power supply you
might experience less power capacity. But this can be compensated by
using newer components to reduce the power consumption. You can build
either type of system so long as you determine the maximum power
capacity per slot..
=Dan
[ My Corner of Cyberspace
http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
Warren Wolfe wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 21:37 -0500, Jack Rubin wrote:
I'm building up a demo S100 system for VCF.
I'm considering using a
modern switching power supply for regulated power and abandoning the
onboard voltage regulators on each card. I know the last CompuPro boxes
took this route so it must be feasible. What is the general
wisdom/experience with this approach?
It should work just fine, assuming you have a switching supply with
a sufficient output. I suppose you could put an inductor coil in series
to block any switching frequency current that bleeds into the supply...
but, I really don't think that is necessary if you are operating the
switching supply within its limits.
A great deal depends upon the cards you are using. When I set up my
IMSAI at the club, I borrowed quite a few 4K RAM cards from other
members, just to have a computer with the "whole" 64 K, minus 4K for the
VDM-1 video (1K) my version of a monitor & BIOS ROM routines (2K) plus
1K of scratch RAM for the monitor, which included a memory test. That
was 15 4K static memory cards, plus everything else. Yikes. It was
drawing just over 32 amps from the IMSAI +5 volt supply, which I think
was rated at 30 amps. Someone I know, out of curiosity, actually
arc-welded with the IMSAI supply.
If you do NOT have 60K of 2102 chips, you will probably be drawing a
lot less current. It would be good to know just how much your system
will be drawing, and over-do it somewhat. That was always my theory...
Peace,
Warren E. Wolfe
wizard at
voyager.net