On 5/22/07, Mr Ian Primus <ian_primus at yahoo.com> wrote:
The 101 is the model shaped and colored much like
a
VT100. The keyboard looks similar... but
its protocol is _not_ compatible with the VT100.
Good thing I didn't buy the one on eBay a couple
months ago. There was a 101 there, and cheap too, but
it had no keyboard.
I may haev a few CiTOH terminals to drag to VCFmw if there's any
interest. Closer to the event, I'll inventory what I have and see if
I kept any spare keyboards "just in case", if anyone out there already
has a terminal, but can't figure out why their VT100 keyboard doesn't
work with it.
I remember back in the day, since we had dozens of CiTOH and DEC
terminals, looking over the available schematics for both and not
being able to figure out how the keyboard works. I think it was a
matter of inadequate/fuzzy docs more than anything else. Does anyone
know of a good printset to pore over to see the nuts-and-bolts of a
VT100-era keyboard? ISTR the crux of it was a 6402-type UART
squeezing out the keystrokes at some slow baud rate, but I can't
recall any essential details right now. I'm just curious if it's
possible to swap a crystal or make a simple, switched change to allow
one keyboard to work across both vendor's product lines.
We used to have lots of dead keyboard when there was one or two
terminals on everyone's desk. Since the company was shrinking at that
stage, we never bothered fixing them - we just pulled one off a vacant
desk and kept working. The number of working keyboards never shrank
below the steadily decreasing size of the staff, so economically, it
made sense. I think I only saved working keyboards in that set of 4
van loads, but it's entirely possible I picked up one or two dead
ones. Right now, I have to search the pile for a VT100 keyboard to
get my DECmate I back up and running so I can press it into service as
an RX01/RX02 image archiver and finally whittle down my cartons of
floppies.
-ethan