Their
"typical examples of passive ps/2 to USB
adapters that are not true ps/2 to USB signal converters" are just
wrong. For example, the second one from the left is a real converter
I agree there
- that second-from-left converter looks to be the same one
as RS
(UK) sell, and is an active converter. However, given that it's the
equivalent
of around $60 I think I'll go with the $18 product :-)
It wouldn't surprise me if some far-east company has cloned the look of
the
active adapter but it's actually a passive one, such that both types exist
on
the market but look the same.
I still cannot understand "uadarrel". In Brazil I can get any of these
for a song.