On 04/19/2013 05:48 PM, Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
Lists with
subject-tagged messages stand
out easily in my (rather large) inbound mail volume.
That's why I prefer it
too, it stands out and I easily know which list
it's from.
And honestly, of the 25 or so mailing lists
that I'm on, this is the ONLY
ONE that doesn't do subject tagging.
I'm on less?but that still holds true
for me.
in which case, it ALREADY stands out and lets you know which list it's
from. "no tag? that is CCTALK."
However, I AM on more than one untagged list.
I would prefer tags, but nowhere near as strongly as some who REALLY
STRONGLY don't want them.
Yeah, I remember when this walk "debated" a few years ago... It's
really
no big deal. Any half-decent MUA can filter based upon a particular email
address in the To, From, CC, of BCC fields. Even Eudora (I think.. ;)
Subject tagging ain't gonna happen. Plus, if you're smart enough to
resuscitate a classic computer, you should have enough brains to figure out
how to add an email filter...
[head explodes]
Is it really so difficult for people to understand that the people who want
subject tagging DO NOT WANT IT FOR SORTING PURPOSES?
WTF?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA