21 Sep
2015
21 Sep
'15
3:48 p.m.
On 09/21/2015 02:58 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
Well, that was a wink-wink-nudge-nudge statement from yours truly.
Wirth & Co. started the project in FORTRAN, but gave up, particularly
when it was realized that implementing data structures and recursion in
FORTRAN was going to be a bit of a task. I think the result was
bootstrapped. I've got a copy of the ETH CDC compiler from 1976,
bearing Urs Amann's name as the author. It isn't exactly Pascal, either.
But if the issue really was data structures, maybe COBOL would have been
a better choice. I do recall that there was at least an Algol-60
compiler on CDC iron at that time.
--Chuck
PASCAL was
first implemented in FORTRAN.
Really? I find it hard to imagine that Wirth would use Fortran for a
compiler. Never mind his background in structured languages --
writing a compiler in Fortran is just much harder. Not as hard as
writing one in COBOL, but still...