13 Aug
2018
13 Aug
'18
10:39 a.m.
On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:12 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 08/12/2018 10:36 PM, robertbeauchamp33--- via cctalk wrote:
The VAX-11/725 and VAX-11/730 is equally bad performance wise. A MicroVAX I is 0.3 VUPS,
and a MicroVAX II is 0.9 VUPS.
http://www.people.vcu.edu/~agnew/MVAX/VAX-PERF.HTML
Zane
My mother is moving and her spouse has a MicroVax
I he bought new back in 1984 for some crazy amount. I don?t see this model listed in your
chart? Can you tell me if there is any value to this machine? He also has two original
monitors.
Wow, relatively rare. Other than historical interest, there's pretty much no
"value" in it. It was a performance DOG.
Jon