9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
11:24 p.m.
On 01/09/2012 05:36 PM, Gary Sparkes wrote:
Funny, I was thinking solaris clusters among other
things when I thought
about availability. :)
Solaris is my primary server OS here. I use NetBSD for some network
infrastructure roles (NAT, etc).
as well as linux, bsd, etc.... most services I can
think about don't care if one or two boxes fail. Then again, half of them
are virtualized anyway and the OS dosnt realize the hardware failed... :)
Indeed. I do have quite a bit of redundancy here (and at work(s)),
but I prefer *NO* failures ideally. I come pretty close to that.
That's the root of my impatience with Windows. (not related to my
impatience with Windows fanboys)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
New Kensington, PA