R. D. Davis wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>--- John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
This problem with the output from inkjet printers
running and laser
printers being unuseable for long-term storage is yet another example
of the preponderance of poor-quality engineering and poor product
quality foisted upon consumers by corporations. Have others here
noticed an increasing proliferation of misleading and down-right
deceptive advertising, and more wide-spread decreases in product
quality ranging from disappointing to unuseable, over the past decade
or so? I'm not just referring to computer equipment, but to products
ranging from basic necessities such as food to more expensive items
like automobiles. It seems like the more companies tout that ISO
?000, or whavever, "quality certification," the worse things seem to
get, as do the prices, which seem to rise inversely with changes in
product quality and convenience. I'll bet that many corporations have
adoped, if you'll pardon the language, "screw the consumer and rake in
the money" as their motto.
<snip>
It didn't take the computer industry very long to figure out what the
auto manufacturers have known for years: building high-quality (machines
/ devices, etc), relatively inexpensive parts is bad for business. Do
it for too long and you'll put yourself out of business.
Mike
http://tarnover.dyndns.org/
Tarnover - The Apple II Repository