12 Apr
2011
12 Apr
'11
12:18 p.m.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Brent Hilpert wrote:
Actually, while I can see people interpreting it as you suggest, I first
interpreted Chris's statement the way he intended it, but maybe I'm not
pretty much everyone. Perhaps it depends on what 'world' one comes from, e.g.
applications vs. systems/languages.
I suspect you may be correct.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-109F/X Project
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_!
Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical
minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which
holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd
by the clean end.
own way of storing data. May not be the first choice
when endeavoring to
write a compiler (though even at least early versions of Turbo C used
pascal conventions), but were any of these tools up to the task?
Oh for...
Look, when you write, "I'll assume Quick C could be used to write Quick
Basic" that says to pretty much everyone that reads it that you're asking
if you can write QB code in QC. You never mentioned writing a compiler.