It's like navigating around Boston--if you lived
there, you'd know
where you were headed.
Most of the US tube numbering systems are today fairly meaningless,
and yes, the best way to know what tubes you are looking at is to
pretty much know what circuits you are looking at. The initial
"standard" (an example would be UV-201) set by RCA was quickly
corrupted by the independents, so the industry set up a new standard
that we all (US) know and love. I suspect that the choice to
standardize the filament voltage and active number of elements in the
type number, yet leave out the basic function, was driven by the idea
that many radio designs could easily morph, simply with a tube swap,
in order to meet a new demand. An example might be changing a standard
AC power radio into a farm set into a car radio - mostly with only a
tube swap involving filament changes. In an early 1930s context, this
starts to make sense. However, with the explosion of new types, I
think this was all corrupted as well, and by the late 1930s it was
pretty much as meaningless as it is today. The industry standard 55xx
series, where most computer tubes reside, chucked all ideas of
encoding stuff in the number, and in a way has remained very intact.
The European system used this same idea, tried to encode a little more
into the type numbers, but still managed to corrupt itself. An article
in Tube Collector magazine outlined the system, and there are an
astonishing amount of inconsistencies. In a way, it tried to be too
clever.
Of all these systems, the most simple ones tend to be the best - do
not encode anything into the type numbers. If a tube user needs to
figure out just what a specific tube type does, he probably has no
business sticking his nose into the radio in the first place.
The award for most retarded tube numbering must go to the British.
Apart from the military's CV (common valve) system, which almost
nobody but the military uses, the British system was a mess, with
numbers and formats specific to the government agency or industry that
wrote the databooks. Often these numbers would even foul each other.
The best example is the VT90. If you ordered a VT90 each from the
Army, Air Ministry, and Post Office, you would get three completely
incompatible tubes. And during World War 2, if you ordered a VT90 in
Britain, you might get a humble little US made 6H6 dual diode - a
"fourth" VT90.
--
Will