Hey, Mr. Fogg: I'm a reporter and a pretty serious
computer
collector, too.
So, if it makes your tiny brain happy, go ahead believing
that anyone who isn't in high-tech must not be as smart as
you; that any idiot can be a good writer and researcher; that
I spend my day like the papparazzi desperate to fill pages;
and that it's all to inflate my ego. Oh, and that I'm one
step from selling fries at McDonalds, that sure was clever of
you. But you know what?
When your computer company has layoffs, that will be
something to write about too. Maybe then you'll be selling
fries, or worse, reduced to helping stupid users at Fry's.
At least they won't off-shore your job, you moron.
My company did have massive layoffs - 2 years ago - due to Microsoft
buying them. With 20 years of broad enterprise experience I've yet to be
re-employed. I have a terminal illness that is beginning to show
physical signs that HR people ask about, so re-employment is not likely.
I cannot perform the job of fry chef as I cannot stand for more than an
hour.
In my blanket generalization of *magazine* writers (not newspaper
reporters and book writers) I never made a claim of specific
intelligence. In fact I labeled them as Journalism and English majors,
not idiots that can't get a college degree. But my statement stands -
they typically don't have the background to fully understand what they
are writing about. Most magazine articles are written in a style that
presents the author as someone knowledgeable in the subject of the
article (a difference from reporters who present what they find and how
they found it). Book authors usually *are* knowledgeable in the subject,
and often partner with a writer to better present the material in a
professional and understandable manner.
My inclusion of a reference to fast-food workers was actually a vague
reference to the stabs at certain professions such as Journalism/English
repeatedly made in the comic strip "Dilbert". Some professions, such as
music, acting and writing, have a stigma of early-career joblessness
(how many actors were waiters?). It was a bit harsh, and I apologize.
This has nothing to do with technocracy or elitism. I don't expect a
lawyer or physician to build or fix their computer systems and I don't
practice law or medicine. Consumer-grade tech magazines have become a
vast wasteland of simplifications and brain-candy. I think the
expectations placed on magazine writers are unrealistic and driven by
profit and advertiser appeasement.
And I am glad that there are people like you around who can write
authoritatively on a subject that non-tech people have trouble
understanding.