11 Aug
2010
11 Aug
'10
10:44 a.m.
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Gene Buckle wrote:
If a 'party' is what I think it is, I'' jsut stick to fixing my classic
computers ;-)
Well frankly, if I had any idea that you'd go
Old Man McClusky on me while
waving your cane in my face and raving about these damn kids, I just may
have. Unfortunately I constantly forget that you like to party like it's
1979.
HELL, YES!! You damn kids today have no clue how to party. Herpes was the worst incurable STD in those days.
Oh no... back then 'STD' meant 'Subscriber Trunk Dialing' and nothing
mroe :-)
Who is Old Man McClusky? Maybe he'd like to come
along.
You know you've been hardware-hackign too long when all you can think of is
the Quine McClusky minimalisation method...
> it should be added that I'm not terribly
understanding of peoples'
> self-configured difficulty. You could easily build a machine that does
Actually,, could I _easily_ build such a macnine? Given that I don't have
one, or anything like it, I can't use CPLDs or FGPAs (the logic compilers
require such a machine to run on, and the chips are not fully docuemtned
so toy can't write your own for whatever machine you happen to have).
Building a machine that runs a graphical browser using only stock chips
doesnt sound totally tivial/.
all these
new-fangled and modern webby things and yet you grump at ME
because you have no way to copy & paste a url into any kind of browser.
That is s'posedly comparably easy to reading "it's a documentary about
Adventure"?