I think
_everyone_ here could do component-level troubleshooting if
they wanted to. It's mostly a matter of logical reasoning,
and I think
everone here can think logically.
This implies that those of us who can't or don't do it are
lazy, and I resent that implication. I am firmly aware of my
limits when it comes to troubleshooting, I'm all thumbs with
a soldering iron, and I don't have the sort of day job that
gives me the time to become acquainted at this level. I can
do many small tasks and do basic troubleshooting, but I think
it is a bit much to expect everyone to perform at your level,
especially those of us who do not have employ in an engineering field.
Considering I do have a doctorate (MD), I don't think this
has to do with sloth on my part.
I'm sure this is not what you meant to say, but it can
certainly come across in that fashion.
"laziness" is an odd angle to take on Tony's comment.
Many retro-computer people I know have full time careers, one is a surgeon
(he can't solder to save his life), a majority just don't have the time to
do more than play the odd game or type in a magazine listing.
They'd rather switch it on and use it, if it dies they might start learning
some electronics, but more likely, they'll bring it over for me to fix.
Retro computing is usually just one hobby of many and therefore learning
fault finding, soldering etc. just isn't in the time budget.
I agree, anyone with some knowledge and practice can fault find at component
level *if they had to/really had the urge to learn*, but many choose to
spend their valuable time on pursuits that give them more pleasure.
Dave ;)