> Consider: the most popular desktop Unix by an
order of magnitude (or
> 2) is Mac OS X. It's outsold all other commercial Unix variants put
> together.
Those two statements do not have as much to do with one another as you
seem to think; without installation statistics on noncommercial Unix
variants, such as Linux, we have no grounds for anything but wild
guesses as to whether OS X is "the most popular desktop Unix". At
least not for values of "Unix" relevant to this thread.
> No X.11 and no networkable GUI.
That's odd. The OS X install I know best - on my ex's iMac - has X.
Two of the programs most often running there are games I wrote, which
definitely use X. Perhaps you're thinking of an outdated version?
> Consider: the most popular Linux by a similar
proportion, with many
> hundreds of millions of users is Android.
> In fact it is fair to say that /only/
deskop/portable/handheld Unix
> variants that *don't* have X.11 have been commercial successes.
What does "commercial success" have to do with it?
I, for example, am running X under a Unix variant on at least a
half-dozen machines that show up in nobody's statistics because
everything on them is noncommercial open-source software, showing up in
no company's sales statistics and not reported to anyone. Nor am I
alone; at one of my workplaces there are more machines running such
systems than those running commercial OSes and at the other it's close
enough to half that I'm not sure which has the majority.
Nobody knows how those stack up against commercial variants, because
the nature of the open-source noncommercial world means the necessary
statistics do not exist. Not only is no-one keeping them, no-one is in
a position to keep them.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B