In that case can ask the UK TNMOC why I should
continue to support them
if they can't do a simple task like this, surely they are the UK
National Museum, they should be able to make this stuff available.
THis is the main reason why I have 'issues' with museums. Of course the
only museums I've had close dealings with are those in the UK.
I will happily state that Al and his colleages do a wonderful job in
preserving and sharing docuemtnation and software. My comments are not
directed to him, his organisation, or any similar organisation.
But IMHO the purpose of a museum is to make artefacts and related
material 'available' Most UK museums fail to do this. THey seem to think
that if they have na artefact than nobody else should have one. Heck, a
lot of UK museums prohibit photography for various bogus reasons [1]
meaning they're a less-than-useful reference source. If they have
docuemtnation, you can be sure it's impossible to refer to,
[1] I can understand that flash photography can damage some artefacts. I
can understnnd that a tripod can be a nuisance at busy times (but surely
they could agree there are non-busy times). Those are not bogus reasons.
But darn it, I refuse to beilve that a flash photograph would damage a
400-year-old clock movement. Or a 40 year old computer chassis.
I'ce lost count of the number of times I've contacted a UK museum who
claims to have some device similar ot one that I am working on and asking
if they could proivde inforamtion only to be ignored or to be told 'No way'
(in various ways...). Since help goes both ways I have made it my policy
not to help UK musuems.
-tony