Howeve, I am sure tht could be taken to be a
derriveative work, and as
such covered in parrt by the licence in question. I know you don't intend
that, but it is not at all clear how a future owner of your technology
could react. I';d certainly want things a lot clearer before I made use
of the STRAM formet.
Hey Tony,
no it can't. Jean did not use "the technology". He got the information from
us and never signed an agreement, NDA or whatever.
If you look at the current rel. 2 of KF 2.0 b9 for the Mac you will find that I already
made a quick fix to the definition of derivative works (threw out the formats). This will
be refined even further.