One further note - on a scale of 1-10, how authentic
do you want
the repaired scope to be?
I'm a bit Tonyish on this: I'd take unauthentic
but working over
authentic but broken any day. :-)
Well, I like things to work, but equally, I do
try to maintain the
original design.
I suspect I care somewhat less about that than you do. At least in
this case.
For example I probably wouldn't replace valve
rectifiers with
semiconductors.
I'm not sure I'd *replace* them, but I'm giving real thought to putting
in parallel power-supply circuitry that uses solid-state rectifiers and
feeds the B+ and HV power lines. But that depends on the correctness
of my guess that removing the rectifier tubes will be enough to isolate
the B+ and HV power so I can feed them externally.
I owuld consider re-winding the transformer (not
original) or useing
serveral separate transformers to replace it (even less original, but
at least the design is basically unchagned).
Yeah. Put it this way: if I were to somehow get an exact replacement
transformer, I'd like to be able to do a little unsoldering and
resoldering and have it in basically original condition. But this is
not inconsistent with using solid-state rectifiers, if my guess about
the rectifier tubes is correct.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B