I do. But
then, I wrote both the tar implementation I use and its
manpage, so perhaps that's cheating. :) (Actually, the manpage is
somewhat out of date; I doubt I've updated it since the last round
of changes to the code....)
I think you started out trying to prove a point, but
you proved
another.
Perhaps. I saw my point as being that yes, there is a <tar,user> pair
where the user thoroughly understands the tar. If your point was that
documentation is inaccurate, then I supported that too.
Is that what they call an "own goal"?
Perhaps, if I were trying to take a stance on some issue, which I
didn't think I was - I thought I was offering a data point to indicate
that the situation of users understanding tar was not *quite* as bleak
as it was painted. (I suppose this could be taken as taking a stance
on the presence of users who grok the tars they use, but in that case I
see no grounds for calling it an own goal....)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B