Hi Gerhard,
Yes - these look good but the price is much higher than what I paid. As I
no longer work, modifying the cheap Chinese banana plugs was viable. If you
still work and are time limited then the Pomona plugs may be the better
option. It may be best to get a small number first to try before committing
to a larger order.
Best regards
Tom
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:06 AM DI Gerhard Kreuzer <
gerhard.kreuzer at liftoff.at> wrote:
Hi Tom,
what do you think about this parts:
Microsoft Word - D5936.doc (mouser.at)
<https://www.mouser.at/datasheet/2/159/D5936-1514588.pdf>
Looks like 0.09" diameter.
With best regards
Gerhard
Zitat von Tom Hunter <ccth6600 at gmail.com>:
Hi Gerhard,
I used the following banana plugs:
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002907717547.html
Please note that only about 30% of the plugs I received were a good fit.
The rest I had to modify.
I had to remove the barrel shaped contact spring and compress it carefully
to open it up to make good contact with the sockets.
I also soldered the barrel shaped contact spring onto the plug body. It is
a lot of work to make the patch cables with plugs which don't quite fit,
but with the modification the result is now neat and usable.
I couldn't find anything else with a better fit. The original 0.1" taper
pins are "unobtainium".
Regards
Tom
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 7:18 PM DI Gerhard Kreuzer via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi,
I also have an H500 waiting for restoration.
Maybe anyone can give better winfos about the plugs/connectors of the
patch cables.
I didn't have any, I have to make new.
With best regards
Gerhard
Zitat von cctalk-request at
classiccmp.org:
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at
classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at
classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at
classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specificthan "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."