27 Sep
2014
27 Sep
'14
7:51 a.m.
On 9/27/14 2:09 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Presumably what was meant was 127.0.0.x, part of the
127.0.0.0/8 block
reserved by RFC 6890 and its predecessors for loopback.
It was a typo. I have been working with some devices that have 128. hardwired
addresses.
It is also sad that this is the only thing that anyone said about my post.
I thought maybe someone might think UDP on a couple of ports might be a
good lightweight portable alternative to USB.
This will be my last post on this subject.