12 Jun
2010
12 Jun
'10
3:09 p.m.
On 06/11/2010 06:05 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 11 Jun 2010 at 14:37, Eric Smith wrote:
I never said it was. I said that it used the same flux-transition
timing as single density, thus the requirements for a reliable data
separator are more akin to those of single density than double density.
Eric
No. You can't even run at 2 MHz. The
accelerators all slow down to
normal Apple II speed (effectively 1.023 MHz average) for disk access.
Right. Looking back at my "Understanding the Apple IIe", the
sequencer runs at 2MHz and the 6502, half that. But the recording
wasn't what I'd call "single density", which to me implies FM.