20 Dec
2010
20 Dec
'10
12:29 p.m.
Interesting... I think it's interesting that despite the criticism by Paramount
management... the movie still made a decent amount of money. Just not enough for
their liking apparently.
________________________________
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Sent: Mon, December 20, 2010 2:20:52 PM
Subject: Re: Star Trek: The Motion Sickness was Re: Sports! was Re: Service
bureaus was Re: Tek 4051 firmware listing was Re: are you sti
As an aside... that movie cost an insane amount of
money. $40M when it was
first made. There was an interesting tidbit of info in one of the
interviews on the Blu-ray extras. The Paramount execs were discussing who
would direct the second movie, and one of them asked the question "Can he do
it for less than 40 @#$@% million dollars?" ST:II cost something like $4M.
That was how Harve Bennett ended up captaining the ST:TOS movies. The
executive in question was Charley Bluhdorn, who it must be recalled was
responsible for several of Paramount's remarkable financial bombs such as
Paint Your Wagon. The Mission: Impossible cast recalls this ruefully as
their unit was routinely overbudget and attracted Bluhdorn's ire multiple
times for the excesses, which the production team usually ignored.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Perl scripting: the ultimate open source software. -------------------------