5 Feb
2008
5 Feb
'08
7:51 a.m.
At 3:34 PM +0000 2/5/08, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On 05/02/2008 15:08, Zane H. Healy wrote:
True, but they lack a certain "style". Call me crazy, but I rate the
RX50 up there with something like my SGI O2 when it comes to "style".
Granted all that style comes at a price, and in the case of an RX50,
that is a less reliable piece of hardware, but since I don't normally
use the floppy drive on my PDP-11 anyway... :^)
Besides I don't have a real RX33 or the hardware to put it in place.
If I did, I'd probably have it installed in my "souped up" /73.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Good question, sounds like you either have an RX33
or someone has
hacked a Teac of the correct model to work as an RX33.
Indeed. And those are considerably more reliable than RX50s are.