Tony Duell wrote:
I hope you're handling 8" disks. I have
some 32 sector hard-sectoed 8"
floppies (blank, so I have no idea what machine they were used in)
It should work with anything that has a 34-pin Shugart interface. It
The 8" drive has a 50 pin interface connector, of course, but most of the
signals are the same as the SA400 interface. The main differences (from
what I rememer) are that the 8" drice may separate index and sector
pulses for hard sectored disks, it may have an interal data separator for
single-density disks, and it will have a TG43 input to reduce write
current on ther inner cyliders. The first 2 things can be jumpered out
(so you cna then treat it like a 5.25" drive, the last is only a problem
if you're writing. It would eb worht adding a signal for this, actually,
if you support dumpling the images back to the physical disks.
supports the pseudo-Shugart interface PCs use
(including the twisted
wire), too.
The current "Must Have" format support list is:
- 8-inch: hard and soft-sector (untested, I don't have a drive or discs)
- 5.25-inch: hard and soft-sector (I have a 96tpi double-sided drive
and soft-sector discs, but no hard-sector ones; a 48tpi double-sided
drive might also be worth testing)
- 3.5-inch: soft-sector. Do hard-sector 3.5" discs even exist? Most
of the drives I've looked at use the position of the spindle motor to
derive the index signal, so I'm guessing "no".
The 3.5" disk doersn't have an index hole in the sense that the other
floppies do. You can't have a 'hard sectored blank disk', for this
reason. I suppose it would be _possile_ to make a drive that produced
multiple index/sector pulses per vevolution, but I've never seen one.
You can alos support 3" drives/disks. The Hitachi drives have a standard
34 pin SA400 interface, the ones that Amstrad used have a 26 pin
connector (IIRC) with the same signals on it. 3" disks do have an index
hole, the sensor is a light barrier there, not a signal on the spindle
motor, but I've never seen or heard of hard sectored disks.
-tony