12 Jun
2007
12 Jun
'07
12:15 p.m.
On 12 Jun 2007 at 13:12, Roy J. Tellason wrote:
Are you 100% sure of that? I was udner the impression that the WD p[art
needed some -ve supplu rail (-12V?) and that the Fujitsu part didn't, the
pin was a N/C. The Fujistu chip will replace the WD with no problems, but
the reverse may not be true (and IIRC, the HP board that started this
doesn't have a -ve supply rail).
-tony
I read this and for some reason the part number
MB8877 comes to mind. Is that
it by any chance?
The drawer in my parts locker labeled "WD1793" has a number of
MB8877s. They're the same.