22 May
2016
22 May
'16
2:18 p.m.
On Sun, 22 May 2016, Mouse wrote:
Why bother?
Won't:
size_t foo = ~0UL;
do (~0ULL for C99)?
Only if size_t is no larger than unsigned long int (unsigned long long
int for the ULL version). I don't think that's guaranteed.
How can you have the type of `size_t' wider than the widest unsigned
integer type in the respective revision of the language standard?
Maciej
>
size_t foo = (size_t)-1;
size_t foo = -(size_t)1;
size_t foo = (size_t)(-1);