24 Oct
1998
24 Oct
'98
4:32 p.m.
"Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Please disreagrd this message! I'm really
sleepy....I missed the
fact that a 128-bit processor would access over 4 billion times the
amount a 32 bit one would.
Still a bit sleepy, I'd venture :-)
A 128-bit address is sufficient for a factor 7.9x10^28 more addresses
than a 32-bit address, not a mere 4 billion. But I knew what you meant.
Eric