On 5/30/06, Billy Pettit <Billy.Pettit at wdc.com> wrote:
Some time, we have to let go and upgrade as much as it
is unaesthetic or
displeasing. When?
There comes a time when it's no longer viable to keep old machines
running. Computers aren't anything unique in this regard.
The oldest human weapon that wasn't simply a thrown object is probably
a sling. There's at least one nearly 3,000yr old one that was found in
Egypt, but it's far too fragile to use or test - but for trying it
out, it can be reconstructed:
http://www.petrie.ucl.ac.uk/detail/details/index_no_login.php?objectid=UC69…
After a while, when parts and consumables can no longer be found or
fabricated, old computers, like, say, old motorbikes, are going to
become purely museum pieces, that cannot actually be *run*. They're
already no use - you wouldn't go to work on a 1905 Douglas and you
wouldn't run a PDP-8 to read your email. Doesn't mean they're
valueless. Better to preserve them in their original state in a museum
than to bodge together some hybrid of ancient and modern kit.
To give people the experience of using them, write and emulator & make
it perfect & faithful. That way,m the OS, the software, the data
files, the *feel* of the machine can be kept alive indefinitely.
One day, future computers won't run our current "modern" software. But
we can run the emulator on an emulator when that happens!
--
Liam Proven ? Blog, homepage &c:
http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/Google Talk/Orkut: lproven at
gmail.com
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at
aol.com ? MSN/Messenger: lproven at
hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk ? Skype: liamproven ? ICQ: 73187508