On Oct 22, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Toby Thain <toby at
telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
On 2016-10-22 4:08 PM, allison wrote:
...
FYI I have never heard of any one recreating the RQDX1/2/3 software
protocol MSCP
as it was nontrivial, proprietary, and copyrighted.
It's been implemented in simh, afaik. Its reputation is a little more imposing than
the reality.
Well, it certainly is vastly more complex than the older CSR-based controllers.
That's not to say it's undoable; compared to, say, SCSI it's not that painful.
(In fact, you might say it's a natural predecessor of SCSI.) Proprietary, yes.
Copyrighted? perhaps so, but copyright is irrelevant if you want to build
implementations. (It only matters if you want to make copies of the document.) I assume
MSCP was patented, but any patents have expired long ago so those aren't relevant any
longer either.
The main question is whether a sufficiently accurate spec is available. In the case of
MSCP (and TMSCP, which is a close relative) the answer is yes (on Bitsavers). And unlike
some other standards sources, DEC standards generally are written to the level of quality
that conformance implies interoperability -- in other words, do what the spec says and it
will work correctly.
paul