From: Fred Cisin
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:19 PM
Should we define Esperanto as a "living human
language"?
That is a question that has arisen in the context of creole studies and
the study of linguistic universals in linguistics. Esperanto as defined
by Zamenhof violates several apparent universals of human language, and
speakers have smoothed out some of those rough edges.
In addition, there are reports of native speakers of Esperanto, defined
as children for whom it is the first language, learned in environments
in which only Esperanto was spoken. These reports have been questioned,
as one might imagine, but I personally have not followed up on them as
they fall outside my personal interests.
So: If there are children who speak it natively, then the answer to
Fred's question is certainly "yes". Given the very large community for
whom it is a useful second language, with literature as well, then the
answer is "yes, probably". If it were restricted (as it is not) to a
minimal vocabulary with no potential for growth, then the answer would
be "certainly not".
I'm of the "yes, probably" camp most of the time.
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Vulcan, Inc.
505 5th Avenue S, Suite 900
Seattle, WA 98104
mailto:RichA at
vulcan.com
mailto:RichA at
LivingComputerMuseum.org
http://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/