On 12/19/2011 09:21 AM, David Riley wrote:
On the other
hand VMS was/is trying to maintain a reputation of 24x365 and M$ was reboot often and keep
the reset switch on the
front of the machine. To have a machine that can do 24x365 you need good hardware and
all along there were PCs up to the task
but the OSs common were not so robust. From my perspecive at one time I had the luck of
running VMS, One of the sorta unix (on pC)
servers and NT4.51, VMS the biggest job was keeping the power supplied to the box and
occasion new product additions, The unix PC
was fairly stable but would suffer from disk and IO issues, the NT3.51 box was same
hardware and added BSOD and memory leaks
requiring reboots every week or application hangs never minding keeping at it to insure
security. Also the VMS machine I could
develop and deploy often without neededing to write a line of compiled code as DCL was
usually more than enough.
Ironic, considering Dave Cutler was the chief NT architect.
From what I'm told, current NT-based Windows bears little resemblance
to what Dave Cutler actually intended, though.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
New Kensington, PA