I think an important difference with Al's work on Bitsavers is that people
all over the world are able to benefit from what he does. Real museums that
people can visit *are* very important but they reach magnitudes fewer
people. A global resource that is available online to people wherever they
can access the net is *more* valuable from a practical standpoint. The
document and software archive Bitsavers has is useful, not just
interesting. And the materials that aren't directly useful today but are
historically interesting and important are still accessible to everyone.
Any computing museum today needs to make every effort to get as much of
their doc and software online as well as in exhibits people can see and
touch. Bitsavers is mirrored in many places and is no longer a single point
of failure. To me it's an obvious choice for any software and doc. It has
become the defacto clearing house for this kind of material and at this
point it probably does more harm than good for other sites to start their
own collections unless somebody can create a top level aggregator and index
over all that. Bitsavers has become *the* place to look and this is a major
strength; if things are spread all over the net it's very hard to locate
them. Competition will hurt all of us, cooperation will benefit all of us.
Thank you Al and everyone else who is archiving software and doc for
posterity and who makes it available to those of us in far flung places.
--
_ _
._ _ _ <_> ___ _ _ ___ ___ ___ _| | ___
| ' ' || |/ | '| '_>/ . \/ | '/ . \/ . |/ ._>
|_|_|_||_|\_|_.|_| \___/\_|_.\___/\___|\___.