6 May
2007
6 May
'07
10:05 a.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 6 May 2007 at 8:10, Philip Pemberton wrote:
By that I assume you mean that they use the index pulse to mark the sectors,
but ignore the track start marker?
Otherwise how could they be called hard-sectored if they weren't synchronising
the sector boundaries against sector marks on the disc?
Thanks.
--
Phil. | (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk | (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | (")_(") world domination.
My question is, does sector 1 start at 1, 2 or 3?
Yes, it starts at 3, providing you acknowledge that "Sector 1" is a
completely artificial notion. (i.e. There are a few hard-sectored
systems that don't look for the index pulse at all.)