It was thus said that the Great Brent Hilpert once stated:
Is your typical $200 / 3*-optical-zoom / 5-MPixel camera good for this or
does one have to go to something higher end with a special lens, etc.?
It's subjective as to what's adequate of course, but I'd be interested in
opinions.
That should be good enough. But you'll definitely want a tripod (which
aren't that expensive) since (in my experience) digital cameras tend to be
slow in capturing a picture (compared to film cameras) in even medium light.
Also, when you get the camera, set it up on the tripod, and take a
bazillion pictures with a test object. For each picture, you'll change some
setting (make sure you keep notes) and then view them afterwards. This will
get you familiar with the camera's features and what settings "work" for
you. Some of the critical settings are things like light balance (or color
temperature), exposure compensation, the timer (waits X seconds prior to
taking a picture), ISO (sensitivity of the "film"), etc.
I had to do this back when I took photography in school (using film!) as
part of familiarizing ourselves with our equipment. With digital
photography, this won't be as expensive as with a film camera, so its well
worth the time to do it.
-spc (Sure, I miss using my 35mm camera, but the digital is way more
convenient ... )