11 Aug
2006
11 Aug
'06
11:08 a.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 8/11/2006 at 11:25 AM woodelf wrote:
How about being really unconventional and building an asynchronous CPU?
Didn't SDS make something like that?
Or, be
unconventional and do 37 or some other prime number.
I'd like to do
'42' but that number was already taken by the SI-FI guys.
I still would like someday to build a trinary computer -1,0,+1 as a real
system.