S100 archive?

Fred Cisin wrote: It depends. Certainly when Andy Warhol makes a mechanically- assisted reproduction of a Campbell's Soup Can, or 32 of them, he's making original art... just based on a trademarked logo. I know, trademarks are not the same as copyrights. But other artists do montages of newspaper clippings to great effect, and there the originals were protected by copyright. Or look at Blue Man Group's "Project 13". They didn't own the copyrights to the original documents, yet they make a perfectly good statement using them. At the same time I'm sure BMG pays for the clips of Devo and Freebird they use to great effect in their shows :-) His status as a former commercial artist of course has a lot to do with his other art. I bumped up against that specialty several times over my career and have a lot of respect for what they do. I also like Roy Lichtenstein, BTW :-). Others here probably don't like this kind pop-art stuff. But my experience with commercial artists has really made me appreciate mechanical processes as well as the results. Tim.