25 Feb
2007
25 Feb
'07
8:18 a.m.
John Foust wrote:
At 09:55 AM 2/25/2007, Jules Richardson wrote:
So what? If it's just observation involving products from different vendors,
backed up with documentation used to arrive at that observation, then where's
the actual case? All the suing company will get is a long drawn-out battle
after which they'll lose and have to pay massive legal costs.
In fact, by *not* publishing manufacturer names, it almost makes Google look
like they're not running their drives according to the manufacturer's
recommendations (heat, humidity etc.), therefore making the published results
suspect anyway.
I'm baffled as to why they could be sued over
personal observation; what possible grounds could anyone have for suing someone who states
"I have one of these and it didn't work very well in these particular
circumstances"?
A market cap of many billions of dollars?