From: Al Kossow
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:45 PM
On 9/20/13 1:52 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
> In deference to Al's nit-picking
All of the documentation I've looked at from the
time called them
"punched" cards which is why I said "historically accurate".
There is a physiological/phonological reason for "punched card" to
become "punch card", having to do with the articulatory difficulty
of pronouncing the cluster [?tk] which occurs in rapid (i.e. not
carefully articulated) English language speech.
I can pretty much guarantee you that even the purists who insist that
they *always* say [p?n?t.kard] are "hearing" what they are thinking,
and that a sound spectrogram will show that there is no evidence for
a [t] in the speech stream of a normal-speed utterance of the phrase.
I'm speaking here as a trained linguist who spent 2 years in phonetics
labs studying this particular sort of phenomenon, rather than pulling
the claim out of thin air. I'm not disputing what the written language
says the phrase is.
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Living Computer Museum
2245 1st Avenue S
Seattle, WA 98134
mailto:RichA at
LivingComputerMuseum.org
http://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/