15 Mar
2021
15 Mar
'21
9:42 a.m.
On 3/15/21 7:23 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
The 386
loadall instruction was different (not really a surprise since
the internal microarchitecture was different).? The 386 didn't need to
do this "hack" because it had vm86 mode for tasks so that accomplished
what everyone was really using LOADALL on the 286 for.
At this point I don't recall.? But I suspect it was allegedly
simpler
conceptually.
--
TTFN - Guy
From: Guy
Sotomayor
the LOADALL instructions including all of
it's warts (and its inability
to switch back from protected mode)
Good to have that confirmed (for the 286; apparently it works in the 386). the other way to get back to real mode from
protected mode is via a
triple-fault.
Any insight into why IBM didn't use that, but went with the (allegedly slow)
keyboard hack?