<Silly> RE: Help with question about web page access

>> -----Original Message----- >> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org >> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Hans Franke >> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:11 PM >> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts >> Subject: Re: <Silly> RE: Help with question about web page access >> >> Am 17 Aug 2004 13:06 meinte David V. Corbin: >> > >>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of >> Ed Kelleher At >> > >>> 11:23 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote: >> > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Help with question about web page access >> > >>> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> At 10:49 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote: >> > >>> > >>> >WHY DOES SOMEBODY HAS TO SLAP A TINY TINY >> UNREADABLE FONT >> > >>> > >>> IN MY FACE? >> > >>> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> It takes less bandwidth and server space. >> > >>> > >>> >> > >>> >Um...NO...not at all.... >> >> > >>> Well certainly then because of reduced X radiation >> from the CRT. >> > >>> The smaller fonts disturb less phosphor. >> > >>> You'd probably get increased life from your CRT also >> in that case. >> >> > Well...It could be, but is the person uses a dark font on a light >> > background [IMHO as it should be], then the increased area of >> > backgound actually increases radiation! >> >> Are you shure? I mean, if a light backgroung emmits more >> radiation, then we should switch for black paper as sonn as >> possible. >> >> Gruss >> H. >> -- >> VCF Europa 6.0 am 30.April und 01.Mai 2005 in Muenchen >> http://www.vcfe.org/ >>