1 Jun
2014
1 Jun
'14
1:28 p.m.
John Dvorak wrote about the interrupt conflict in the Nov 7, 1983 issue of
InfoWorld.
http://books.google.com/books?id=0C8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA112
Michael Holley
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Holley
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 12:21 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: RE: Least PC-Compatible MS-DOS machines?
I recall that the 80186 had an interrupt conflict with MS-DOS.
Michael Holley
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Mouse
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 10:01 AM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Least PC-Compatible MS-DOS machines?
[...]. 80186/80286 dual-CPU machine, [...].
Completely and utterly
different hardware--was constructed to run Xenix for the 80286, with
the 80186 doing I/O work. I can't think of a single PC-compatible
compatible aspect.
The 80286 and 80186 were actually used in IBM PCs of various generations,
were they not? If so, the basic instruction set would be a PC-compatible
aspect, would it not?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B