28 Oct
2015
28 Oct
'15
1:40 p.m.
Well I just figured out something important...The switch numbers on my
board backwards! I was going over the docs again, and noticed that MSB
and LSB in their board diagram were on the wrong sides, compared to
the switch numbers referenced on the next page. I'm not sure if that's
just the way it is, or maybe someone replaced my switches at some
point. After changing my switches I can now read 774400, which gives
me 144201.
The VRLAC0 diagnostic now goes further, but it thinks something is
wrong. Now of course I have no idea what it thinks is wrong here!
DR>START
CHANGE HW (L) ? Y
# UNITS (D) ? 1
UNIT 0
11/23 PROCESSOR (L) Y ?
BUS ADDRESS (O) 174400 ?
VECTOR (O) 160 ? 330
DRIVE (O) 0 ?
BR LEVEL (O) 5 ?
CHANGE SW (L) ? Y
DROP ON ERROR LIMIT (L) N ?
AUTOSIZE (L) N ?
CVRLA DVC FTL ERR 00113 ON UNIT 00 TST 009 SUB 000 PC: 020052
BUS RESET DID NOT CLEAR RLCS
CONTROLLER: 174400 DRIVE: 0
EXP'D: 140200 REC'D: 144200
CVRLA DVC FTL ERR 00004 ON UNIT 00 TST 012 SUB 000 PC: 020264
RLCS READ/WRITE ERROR (BIT 0 DON'T CARE)
CONTROLLER: 174400 DRIVE: 0
EXP'D: 140200 REC'D: 144200
CVRLA DVC FTL ERR 00007 ON UNIT 00 TST 015 SUB 000 PC: 020600
BIT SET INSTRUCTION ON RLCS YIELDED WRONG RESULT
CONTROLLER: 174400 DRIVE: 0
EXP'D: 140200 REC'D: 144200
CVRLA DVC FTL ERR 00008 ON UNIT 00 TST 016 SUB 000 PC: 020724
BIT CLEAR INSTRUCTION ON RLCS YIELDED WRONG RESULT
CONTROLLER: 174400 DRIVE: 0
EXP'D: 141776 REC'D: 145776
... And many more!
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Ben Sinclair <ben at bensinclair.com> wrote:
Okay, I think I need to be looking at 774400, which
doesn't return
anything. Also, the PDP11GUI has a handy RL11 dialog to show all of
the registers, which I think shows the same thing... It's not there!
I've double checked my switch settings, and tested the switches
themselves for continuity just to make sure they weren't bad (which
has happened to me before). Beyond something physically wrong with the
boards, is there anything else I might check?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Ben Sinclair <ben at bensinclair.com> wrote:
--
Ben Sinclair
ben at bensinclair.com
For 18 bit addresses, I assume I would look at
74400 instead? I get
177777 there.
I did just try moving the RLV11 boards below everything else (except
the BDV11), with the same results as before.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se> wrote:
--
Ben Sinclair
ben at bensinclair.com On 2015-10-28 18:25, Ben Sinclair wrote:
--
Ben Sinclair
ben at bensinclair.com
I just tried to read 774400 from ODT, and it just gives the question
mark. So, I don't think it's seeing it at all right now! I'll try
moving it next.
I wonder if it really uses 18 bit addresses in the console.
Johnny
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Ben Sinclair <ben at bensinclair.com>
wrote:
>
> No magic smoke so far!
>
> I think you had written something a while back that would test that
> interrupt. Was that correct, or is there another diagnostic I can use
> to test that?
>
> The 17440 wasn't a typo, it's just my misunderstanding of how the
> addressing works. I'll read the actual location later today and see
> what I find!
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Ben Sinclair
>>
>> > According to the Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook, my H9273
>> backplane
>> > should be all ABCD.
>>
>> Yup, that was one of the first things I checked - whilst realizing that
>> if
>> it wasn't, it was too late... :-)
>>
>> > Am I correct in that I shouldn't have any problem using the RLV11
>> in
>> > that backplane?
>>
>> Not that I am aware of.
>>
>> Noel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ben Sinclair
> ben at bensinclair.com
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol